Buy on Amazon
£579.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3692 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 28% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1620 - 141 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
13.172302737520129%
Multi-Core
723
3.311500938945633%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
