Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 218 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 5% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1620 - 157 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
60.95380029806259%
Multi-Core
723
31.448455850369726%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
