Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1620 - 225 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |