Buy on Amazon
£24.62
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 41 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 155 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£24.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
