Key Differences
In short — Pentium G2120 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G2120 is 91 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Pentium G2120 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Celeron G1610T - 157 vs 149 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
