Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1899 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 35 vs 62 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610T - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 62 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |