Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 4% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Pentium G4400 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 3 MB Cache 54 W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 2617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
