Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
