Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $513
Availability
MSRP in USD: $513
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2520 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 55 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77147 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9900KS Coffee Lake 4.0GHz 16MB Cache LGA 1151 CPU Desktop Processor Boxed
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 77147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
23.93258426966292%
Multi-Core
739
8.597021870637505%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
