Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1610 - 517 vs 441 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |