Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 188 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1610 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
80.07518796992481%
Multi-Core
739
65.39823008849558%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |