Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - £5.56 vs £187.33
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1610 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76702 minutes ago
AMD YD260XBCAFBOX Ryzen 5 2600X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler
Buy for £187.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.438156831042846%
Multi-Core
739
14.041421242637279%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
