Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 7% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1610 - 117 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
29.338842975206614%
Multi-Core
739
15.827800385521526%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
