Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 456 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron B830 - 152 vs 147 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |