Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2500 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 81% better in F1 23 than Celeron B830 - 241 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
241
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£205
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |