Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 240 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 81% better in League of Legends than Celeron B830 - 58 vs 32 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
58
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
