Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 63 days older than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron B820 - 129 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
