Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3362 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 35 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron B815 - 164 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £66.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |