Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1829 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Pentium G4560 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Celeron B815 - 146 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Single-Core
240
33.946251768033946%
Multi-Core
424
29.201101928374655%
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |