Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2669 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than Celeron B815 - 176 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |