Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Celeron 3865U - 240 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 16 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £250.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
392
16.533108393083086%
Multi-Core
692
6.320789185239313%
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |