Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 1786 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 3865U - 299 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
