Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 3865U - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£470
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |