Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 915 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Celeron 3865U - 724 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
