Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron 3865U - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
213
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |