Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 223 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 15 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 5% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron 3205U - 158 vs 151 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
