Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2207 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3205U - 376 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
