Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 457 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron 3205U - 203 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
