Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 848 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 15 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 95% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 3205U - 413 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i5-7640X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 112 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
