Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 668 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 2955U - 172 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£80.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |