Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 669 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 2955U - 256 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 4 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-6600
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
