Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1691 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron 2955U - 200 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
