Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 547 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 17 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 1037U - 321 vs 313 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
