Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Celeron 1037U - 217 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |