Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 1037U - 175 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
310
21.73913043478261%
Multi-Core
513
12.170818505338078%
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |