Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1227 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 17 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 1007U - 528 vs 499 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
249
19.88817891373802%
Multi-Core
419
5.886484967687553%
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
