Buy on Amazon
£242.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 1007U - 112 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for £242.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
249
14.647058823529413%
Multi-Core
419
5.1837189162439685%
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.