Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of FX-9590
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - £535.43 vs £564.99
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-9590 - 495 vs 454 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than FX-9590 - £1.14 vs £1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for £535.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8675 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
495
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8675 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |