Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3129 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of FX-9590
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £535.43 vs £2511.32
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-12400 - £2.33 vs £9.93 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-9590 - 253 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £535.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7462 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
253
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.93/FPS
23%
Price, £
£2511.32
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7462 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |