The FX-8370 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom X4 9650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8370
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
FX-8370 vs Phenom X4 9650 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
97%
Min 1% FPS
110
97%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8370 vs Phenom X4 9650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8370 vs Phenom X4 9650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8370 vs Phenom X4 9650 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8370 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
| Vishera | Codename | Agena |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | unknown |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
