The FX-8350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
125 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
