The FX-8350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8350
The Core i9-13900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8350 vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, £
£522.86
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.43/FPS
100%
FX-8350 vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8350 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8350 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
