In Battlefield 6, the FX-8320E is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 161% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
61 FPS
38%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
39%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
