The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i7-9700 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-9700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, £
£206.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-9700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
