The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i5-13400 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-13400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Core i5-13400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£166.3
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i5-13400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-13400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-13400 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
