The FX-8320 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 3950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 9 3950X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 3950X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£799
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.13/FPS
100%
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 9 3950X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $749.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |