The FX-8320 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 1600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 1600X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 1600X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
$1.69 | MSRP | $2.49 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Zen |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
