The FX-8300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 6900HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8300
The Ryzen 9 6900HX is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 6900HX
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rembrandt |
95 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |