The FX-8300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 1700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 1700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 1700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $3.29 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Zen |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
