The FX-8300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-11900F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-11900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Core i9-11900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, £
£266.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
100%
FX-8300 vs Core i9-11900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $422.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
